Sen. William E. Borah |
One of the big differences between William Edgar Borah’s
heyday and the current times are the speeches – who, popularly, today is
renowned for their oratory? Today, presidents, get that spotlight. In the early 20th c. Borah would
pack the Senate chambers in scenes currently reserved for the State of the
Union Address. This is the time when
radio was still being developed and televisions were a dream of the future.
In 1911 Arizona was seeking statehood and found one major
stumbling block: it was attempting to keep a provision in its constitution that
allowed for the recall of judges. This
comes down to allowing the judiciary to be independent and make difficult
choices that may be popularly disapproved of – without fearing reprisals
through getting recalled. Borah made a
speech on the subject and the New York Sun
printed it in its entirety. The Sun’s editors had this to say:
“We believe that this
speech will take high and permanent rank among the great efforts of
philosophical statesmen, not only for the dignity of its thought and expression
but also for the quality of the patriotism shown by the conspicuous leader of
the so-called progressives who dares thus to expose and rebuke the dangerous
error of purpose so prevalent among his associates.
. . . to every person promoting this insidious
movement of the overthrow of the established system, to every state wherein the
poison is progressively operating, Senator Borah says: ‘We owe it to ourselves
and to posterity, to the institutions under which we live, and above all to the
common people of this country, to see to it that the judiciary is placed, as
nearly as human ingenuity can do so, above the reach of influence or of any of
the things which may cloud the mind with passion or dull the conscience to the
highest demand of even handed justice.’”
Today we have
different methods of discourse – no need to make a judgment and place one form
of media over the others. But what today
would be the equivalent of one of these blockbuster speeches? What could capture that energy where a leader
uses language to convince his opponents of the righteousness of his argument? The senate chambers packed with auditors
clamoring to listen to the orator, the speech to be published in the papers the
next day. Not to make a judgment call,
but that is a better world.
No comments:
Post a Comment