The idea of heightened complexity in societies before they
collapse and the idea that people today mask a helplessness when facing
societal fragility by a misplaced concern about politics.
So, yeah, Holly and Jasun entered some interesting
waters – the idea that there is a mechanism – inside people’s
psychology/psyche/minds – that can be and are exploited: if an actor (like
anywhere from a movie actor to a politician, to anybody behaving anywhere,
anyway, anytime) acts in a certain way it pushes buttons in said psyche of the
audience which elicits known responses. Simply
state, people act in a certain way to manipulate their audience. But the interesting part of this as it
relates to politics is the idea that there are subconscious cues/reactions.
Jasun referenced organizations that studied and subsequently
tried to control these cues/reactions. In
order to control the direction society was/is going. Call it an advanced study of human
nature. Or politicians and various other
actors do not consciously push those manipulative buttons but are personally
adept at subconsciously recognizing certain reactions by altering their act in
whatever way. As Holly said, a
literalization of this adaptive technology already exists where people recognize
what they want to recognize in actors and the actors provide a blank enough canvas
to allow for people to place their hopes and dreams and wishes upon, the actors
becoming that estranged or deceased family member we want to appeal to and
receive adulation from.
No comments:
Post a Comment