New profile pic

New profile pic

Sunday, April 24, 2016

Revolt children!


Goya's Saturn [Cronus] Devouring His Son
     If we have one predominant faith in the United States, it is the faith in progress.  Like religion or custom, faith in progress sinks into the background. It is something that profoundly shapes our reality but is not openly talked about.  You can hear it in news show segments on technology or in concentrated form on NPR’s All Tech Considered – reporters waxing orgasmic over the latest gadgets or trends (most of which are nascent – gadgets or trends – and require the development of some vast, new energy source to even begin to be implemented.) 

     Have you heard of the fourth industrial revolution (FIR)?  Me neither until a recent show informed me on this concept.  From the horse’s mouth in concentrated form:

The First Industrial Revolution used water and steam power to mechanize production. The Second used electric power to create mass production. The Third used electronics and information technology to automate production. Now a Fourth Industrial Revolution is building on the Third, the digital revolution that has been occurring since the middle of the last century. It is characterized by a fusion of technologies that is blurring the lines between the physical, digital, and biological spheres. [. . . ]

Like the revolutions that preceded it, the Fourth Industrial Revolution has the potential to raise global income levels and improve the quality of life for populations around the world. [. . . ]

In the future, technological innovation will also lead to a supply-side miracle, with long-term gains in efficiency and productivity. Transportation and communication costs will drop, logistics and global supply chains will become more effective, and the cost of trade will diminish, all of which will open new markets and drive economic growth.

     Okay – wow - wouldn’t want to be left out of that.  What a great distillation of the myth of progress – always going up, moving forward.  We just need rational implementation to realize the “potential” of everyone – around the world – benefiting.

     What kind of rational implementation, you might ask. 


COVER_ART_502
Gaius


     The full maturation of the FIR vision is in the future, though it has already begun in earnest.  According to its proponents.  Another future is the (doomer?) future where chickens come home to roost and the past repeats itself.  Gaius Publius takes this different view.  The previous industrial revolutions have put us in a situation where our way of life must be altered in order to 1) save the planet, and 2) well, just read this quote:

We don’t want to put our modern consumer lifestyle at risk. We don’t want to have energy rationing in order to save the species.  And I would say that if we don’t have energy rationing and make the change to renewables with World War II force and World War II mobilization and speed then what we are doing is cannibalizing the lifestyle of our grandchildren to keep our Wal-Mart goods and our TV electricity flowing . . . The problem is: are people willing to throw enough money at [solutions] and are people willing to take the kind of sacrifices it takes to mass convert, because at the end of that mass conversion you get your TV non-rationed energy world back, you just have to sacrifice for a little bit to get it.  In ten years we can mitigate that climate crisis a lot.  That’s different than adapting to it.

     So, interestingly, the concept of hardship is introduced.  Lack.  Want.  For a bit.  Above I wrote that 1) we must save the planet.  So 2) is that we go on with the future that I guess the Fourth Industrial Revolution will allow for . . .

     The FIR vision is all optimism.  Gaius’ view shows a punctuated optimism, where the earth must first be saved (perhaps even using some of that FIR sweetness).  So what about none of that happening?  Satyajit Das brings us to rock bottom.  He looks at a world where stagnation reigns, where past and present generations have saddled future generations with insurmountable debt, where the can kicked down the road meets a roadblock or cliff.  He writes:

The 2008 global financial crisis was a warning of the unstable nature of these arrangements. But there has been no meaningful change. Since 2007, global debt has grown by US$57 trillion, or 17 per cent of the world's gross domestic product. In many countries, debt has reached unsustainable levels, and it is unclear how or when it is to be reduced without defaults that would wipe out large amounts of savings.

Economic problems are now compounded by lower population growth and ageing populations; slower increases in productivity and innovation; looming shortages of critical resources, such as water, food and energy; and man-made climate change and extreme weather conditions. Slower growth in international trade and capital flows is another retardant. Emerging markets, such as China, that have benefited from and recently supported growth are slowing. Rising inequality affects economic activity.

For most people, the effect of these problems is unemployment, reduced job security, the deskilling of many professions and stagnant incomes. Home ownership is increasingly out of reach for many. Retirement may become a luxury for all but a few, reflecting increasing difficulty in building sufficient savings. In effect, living standards will decline. Future generations will bear the bulk of the cost as they are left to tackle the unresolved problems of their forebears.

Satyajit Das

     Is it fair to bring up economics?  It’s all connected.  Das brings up the idea of the Titan Cronus eating his children – we in effect are consuming our children’s future, taking up too many resources and wrecking the earth.  Revolt children!  Das says:

The real reason this is not happening is that this is like boiling a frog, it is very slow.  It is not palpably obvious.  And we live in a society where there is a lot of propaganda, where we’ve basically anaesthetized people’s ability to actually think through the issues.  And these people may not become aware of it, and to some extent the fact that we are the wealthiest generation that has ever lived on the planet.  But don’t forget that our lifestyles would have been envied by monarchs as recently as two- or three hundred years ago.  So what happens under these circumstances is pretty simple: we have enough wealth to keep transferring for a little bit longer.  And that sort of dulls this process.  And by the time they realize the game is over, well, the people that are responsible for it are no longer here to be accounted for.

To end with a song:

     Cities rise and cities grow,

     The promised progress keeps them all aglow.

     They breathe, they breed, and thrive,

     The myth of the future is what keeps them all alive.

No comments:

Post a Comment